Skip to main content
Avatar

GPT on Golesh vs Heupel System

TLDR; It seems to be Heupels system with more TE usage, more run game variations, more formations, and more play action. Probably mixing Matt Campbell more pro style concepts in he learned at Iowa State Alex Golesh vs. Josh Heupel – Offensive Differences Tight Ends: • Heupel: Mostly blockers, occasional seams. • Golesh: Heavy TE usage (12/13 personnel), H-back roles, leak routes, TE RPOs, more disguise. Run Game: • Heupel: Inside zone / split zone / GT counter base. • Golesh: More gap scheme (counter/power/toss), more QB run game, pin-and-pull, TE arc/wrap blocks. RPO Menu: • Heupel: Simple access throws + post-snap reads. • Golesh: More pre-snap packages, TE pop RPOs, slant/glance from condensed sets, more “gift throws.” Formations: • Heupel: Extreme wide splits. • Golesh: Mixes condensed, bunch, stacks; better leverage + natural picks; strengthens perimeter run angles. Motion: • Heupel: Minimal motion to preserve tempo. • Golesh: More jet/orbit motion, motion-to-stack, coverage-ID motion, motion-influenced RPOs. Play-Action: • Heupel: Uses it but not heavily layered. • Golesh: More pistol/under-center looks, deep overs, Y-cross, floods, half-roll play-action. Situational Management: • Heupel: Tempo no matter what. • Golesh: Will slow tempo in red zone/long yardage; adjusts personnel/formations based on defensive looks. Overall: • Heupel: Tempo + spacing + verticals + simplicity. • Golesh: Same core system but more variety, more TE influence, more disguise, more motion, and a deeper run/play-action menu.
10 Replies
Avatar

SCarBarner08

Dec 02, 1:32 PM

UTK fans will say similar things. Golesh seems more adaptable
Avatar

Bookout

Dec 02, 1:39 PM

Sounds like hollis davidson fits the scheme
Avatar

Ranemaker

Dec 02, 1:40 PM

SCarBarner08 said:
UTK fans will say similar things. Golesh seems more adaptable
That’s the most important thing to me. No offense gets out dated if you are constantly adapting like the best play callers. Gus and Hugh were just too stubborn to adapt when defenses adjusted.
Avatar

Jsmith5187

Dec 02, 2:10 PM

Bookout said:
Sounds like hollis davidson fits the scheme
I have really HIGH expectations of him
Avatar

Mr. October Kyle Hatcher

Dec 02, 3:29 PM

SCarBarner08 said:
UTK fans will say similar things. Golesh seems more adaptable
I hope this is the case. Going to be fun to see this play out.
Avatar

adamp1

Dec 02, 3:32 PM

SCarBarner08 said:
UTK fans will say similar things. Golesh seems more adaptable
Probably accurate, Golesh has coached under different systems in his career, but it seems like Heupel has run some variation of spread/air raid/veer and shoot his whole career going back to playing under Mike Leach.
Avatar

WeagleWeagleWDE

Dec 02, 3:37 PM

Ranemaker said:
TLDR; It seems to be Heupels system with more TE usage, more run game variations, more formations, and more play action. Probably mixing Matt Campbell more pro style concepts in he learned at Iowa State Alex Golesh vs. Josh Heupel – Offensive Differences Tight Ends: • Heupel: Mostly blockers, occasional seams. • Golesh: Heavy TE usage (12/13 personnel), H-back roles, leak routes, TE RPOs, more disguise. Run Game: • Heupel: Inside zone / split zone / GT counter base. • Golesh: More gap scheme (counter/power/toss), more QB run game, pin-and-pull, TE arc/wrap blocks. RPO Menu: • Heupel: Simple access throws + post-snap reads. • Golesh: More pre-snap packages, TE pop RPOs, slant/glance from condensed sets, more “gift throws.” Formations: • Heupel: Extreme wide splits. • Golesh: Mixes condensed, bunch, stacks; better leverage + natural picks; strengthens perimeter run angles. Motion: • Heupel: Minimal motion to preserve tempo. • Golesh: More jet/orbit motion, motion-to-stack, coverage-ID motion, motion-influenced RPOs. Play-Action: • Heupel: Uses it but not heavily layered. • Golesh: More pistol/under-center looks, deep overs, Y-cross, floods, half-roll play-action. Situational Management: • Heupel: Tempo no matter what. • Golesh: Will slow tempo in red zone/long yardage; adjusts personnel/formations based on defensive looks. Overall: • Heupel: Tempo + spacing + verticals + simplicity. • Golesh: Same core system but more variety, more TE influence, more disguise, more motion, and a deeper run/play-action menu.
I wouldn't say Huepel is tempo no matter what. But this is super involved for Chat GPT. Wouldn't say 100% accurate but pretty close.
Avatar

WeagleWeagleWDE

Dec 02, 3:37 PM

Bookout said:
Sounds like hollis davidson fits the scheme
I actually can't wait to see him practice this spring. Im sure Golesh is happy he is here. Hope Hollis sticks around.
Avatar

WeagleWeagleWDE

Dec 02, 3:38 PM

Jsmith5187 said:
I have really HIGH expectations of him
How long have you been holding on to that one lol
Avatar

StorminNormanAU

Dec 02, 3:40 PM

Preston Howard dark horse Heisman candidate for 2026 👀

Thanks for checking out this free message board preview.

Join the full discussion at The Corner