Of course not but seeing SHU just that once made him believe we were better than he originally believed. Not a ton better, but better.But has he seen every other BE team?
Of course not but seeing SHU just that once made him believe we were better than he originally believed. Not a ton better, but better.But has he seen every other BE team?
Definitely a good example to counteract the need for 5 studs argument.The Powell team in 2018-19 is a pretty good example. They weren't bereft of talent but they weren't winning much without Powell.
And that team was not heavily experienced since the Carrington, Delgado, Rodriguez, Sanogo class had graduated.
If you want five studs, I'd suggest changing your allegiance to Duke, Kansas or someone similar.
I believe he does. When Jerry had a AP Top 25 vote I strongly believe that he was far more knowledgeable than many of his compatriots. Jerry is very fair minded and usually holds his bias at the door.You think he cares about that, lol?
You know him. I don't. For AP Top 25, I'm sure you are right. For purposes of a Seton Hall specific preseason article -- after he's finally gotten some long-desired access, and coming off last year's debacle -- I think his primary goal was to excite the fan base (his readers) with anything and everything positive he witnessed, and ensure the "access" he now has stays that way.I believe he does. When Jerry had a AP Top 25 vote I strongly believe that he was far more knowledgeable than many of his compatriots. Jerry is very fair minded and usually holds his bias at the door.
That’s the example I thought of for a guy who carried their team into the postseason. Albeit a first round loss to Wofford.
it was an arguable rebuild year because of everything that went out the door. Still you had Q as a junior coming in as a transfer from a level he excelled at, Ike coming from FSU, Nzei as a senior who showed he could at least play a power spot in the Big East, Cale as a sophomore, Sandro as a sophomore and others. Most of that group probably starts on this team, even if you take out Powell.
I for one am not expecting great things from this team.Definitely a good example to counteract the need for 5 studs argument.
But please be careful that we aren’t expecting a player from MAAC to step in and do anything close to what Powell did that year. He went from taking a back seat to 4 accomplished seniors to challenging Marcus Howard for BE player of the year honors.
He averaged 23 ppg, shot 36% from 3 on over 8 attempts per game that year, when everyone knew the ball was going to him. If not for his legal matters against the school, Powell is arguably a Mt. Rushmore candidate for the MBB program.
We all want things to be better than last year. I do believe they will be. But we are putting an awful lot of pressure and expectations on a kid who hasn’t even set foot on the court as a Pirate yet.
Sha is in a tough spot and clearly NIL is limiting what roster he can build.I for one am not expecting great things from this team.
To Dehere's point above, you might well start Q, Nzei, Cale and Sandro alongside Clark.
Clark isn't Powell and I think few expect he would be. The fact that none of the others are here is probably an indication that this team is well behind that one.
So what level of success was there when there was only one stud on the team? Tell us how low you set the bar? When KR was here you want to tell me he was the only stud on the team? You disrespect the other kids when you say that and it is not even close to being true!Get some ball knowledge.
I generally agree with you about earning it on the court, but Willard had the 2nd best run of any coach in the last 70 years at SetonHall and took tons of heat here. Louis Orr similarly. I agree we have to do better, but there is an active portion of this community that will always look at the negative.Sha is in a tough spot and clearly NIL is limiting what roster he can build.
but for me and many others he needs to win the fans back. 7-25 and last place will do that. No optimism of any kind from Jerry or anyone “in the know” is going to change that opinion. The program is only going to earn respect through results on the court.
I wish we could’ve had someone do an in-depth piece and postmortem on what went on behind the scenes last season (maybe I missed it with the On3 circusI generally agree with you about earning it on the court, but Willard had the 2nd best run of any coach in the last 70 years at SetonHall and took tons of heat here. Louis Orr similarly. I agree we have to do better, but there is an active portion of this community that will always look at the negative.
To me, Sha tried last year to bring in the disappointing young players and it failed miserably.
This year's gamble is different. This roster is built with a ton of older players or players with alot of experience. The revenue sharing came late for us but it probably opened up the door for Hines. If we improve and have revenue sharing in place for the foreseeable future, we should be in a much better position moving forward after this season.
I wish it would’ve worked out. I don’t want to sit through 7-25, 2-18 and awful looking basketball again. Except for Coleman, all went down a level which is probably the best tell as how they’re seen across the industry.Sha may have gone to the bargain bin but let's not diss the players. Reread their BIOs and you will see there was quality. More so last year. Some of them were highly regarded. They just did not work out with Sha's system and how he used them. Then there were many injuries that prevented the team from meshing and jelling. When you have lots of new faces it is important for guys to have time to play together. There was a lot of disruption due to injuries.
I also don't think Sha did such a great job last year.
i will never be careful with my praise for shu hoops. 1st, 2nd or 3rd team all BE for Budd!To me “Star” is a first, second or third team BE player. Is Clark a star? I don’t know.
If our guys can’t start on the majority of BE teams (and that includes Bud), we should be a little more careful about who is a star.
Well yours and Jerry's views, insights and opinions are great to have. A wealth of knowledge for sure. You folks do have a built in bias as we all do. I'm sure there was optimism when you and Jerry did this for last year's team too. I was optimistic too (even if you think I am always negative) and we saw how that played out. I think we need to be very careful about expectations given almost a completely new starting lineup. Way too many unknowns. As many have said practices and the team on paper means nothing until the actual games are played and we actually see what the kids can do on the court against real competition.
Outside of expecting Bud to be a starter we are not sure who the other 4 will be. That is interesting and scary!
I'm just happy we have an actual point guard. It's funny that we are now basically being told that we are not good fans of the program if we are not content with mediocrity.
AgreedPiratz given the horrible results how could they get recruited to major programs? That does not mean that individually there are not some really quality kids in that group. Some of them where 4 star HS kids! Something went wrong last year no doubt. Bring talent together that did not mesh was part of it.
And you know how fans are contributing or not? Please enlighten us?Who's saying that? I've been saying maybe a little spoiled from the back half of the Willard years to meltdown over one awful season. Hopefully, lessons were learned, and we see improvement annually, going forward.
If our fans are "bad" in any way, it's in contributing.
The two 4 star guys out of HS that you mention underperformed at their previous colleges. We took a chance and it didn’t work. Those guys were well below the lofty expectations they had coming out of HS when they arrived at SHU. Now those two guys and every guy who left with remaining eligibility are at lower level schools with the exception of Coleman. There was very little talent.Piratz given the horrible results how could they get recruited to major programs? That does not mean that individually there are not some really quality kids in that group. Some of them where 4 star HS kids! Something went wrong last year no doubt. Bring talent together that did not mesh was part of it.
Or maybe the "on paper" evaluation is wrong and fluffed? Why are we taking these as Gospel? Recruiting rankings of HS players are notoriously flawed historically. I think they need to be judged for what they produce on the court and their actual college careers, not what scouts thought of them 3+ years ago in HS for some.Here are 3 BIOS for 3 of the guys Sha brought in and they were all great on paper and he did well to get them on paper. Something went wrong when they all bombed here. Was it them? or something else? The chemistry? The coaching style? The style of play? The talent must have been there.
Gus
BEFORE SETON HALL: Ranked as the 17th best center in the country for his class, according to 247 Sports ... Attended IMG Academy (Bradenton, Fla.) and the Asheville School (Asheville, N.C.) during his sophomore and junior years before landing at La Lumiere (La Porte, Ind.) for his senior year ... Helped La Lumiere finish 18-10 in the National Interscholastic Basketball Conference (NIBC), which is considered to be one of the toughest conferences in the nation ... Had a strong summer in the Nike EYBL prior to his senior season, which included a 35-point, 17-rebound performance at the prestigious Nike Peach Jam in July.
Scotty
2023-24 (Ohio State): Appeared in 30 games, making one start ... Averaged 4.4 points and 1.7 rebounds in 15.3 minutes per game ... Was 28-of-62 from three-point range for a solid 45.2 percent ... Made 10 of his final 12 three-pointers over his last five games ... One of the team’s quickest defenders. Had seven blocks and 11 steals ... Had a very good in his collegiate debut, scoring 13 points and grabbing eight rebounds while posting a team-high +19 plus/minus in the season opener vs. Oakland (11/6) ... Had nine points and five rebounds in his first Big Ten road game at Penn State (12/9) ... Was 4-of-4 from the floor and finished with nine points at Indiana (1/6) ... Made his first collegiate start in the win at Michigan State (2/25), finishing with three points ... Connected on a season-high three three-pointers, finishing with nine points in the win over Nebraska (2/29) ... Was perfect from the floor, going 4-for-4 and 3-of-3 from long range to finish with 11 points in the Big Ten Tournament win over Iowa (3/14)
HIGH SCHOOL: A five-star prospect who was ranked 34th nationally according to ESPN ... Versatile perimeter player who played on one of the most talented teams in the country at Sunrise Christian ... Helped lead Sunrise Christian to the Geico Nationals in each of his last two seasons. Sunrise reached the final four in his senior year after knocking-off defending champion and top-seed Montverde in the first round ... Was a team captain for his senior season ... Averaged over 12 points and 2.5 assists per game at Sunrise in the 2022-23 season ... Was considered one of the best perimeter defenders in the class, both on and off the ball ... Played for Brad Beal Elite AAU team on the EYBL Circuit ... Helped lead Brad Beal Elite to the Elite 8 of Nike’s Peach Jam where he averaged 10.9 points, 4.0 rebounds and 2.0 assists across the seven games.
Garway
Coming out of California, Dual was as consensus four-star, top-50 prospect in the class of 2023 due to his size, including a long wingspan, and his high-end athleticism and explosiveness. He’s the fifth former four-star prospect to commit to the Hall as a transfer this offseason, joining guard Zion Harmon, wing Scotty Middleton, forward Prince Aligbe and center Gus Yalden. This is clearly a pattern by head coach Shaheen Holloway – reclaiming talented players who didn’t flourish as expected at their last stop (it should be noted that Harmon was productive, but at a low-major).