Copeland

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,051
1,030
113
I’m the biggest Hurley Sr fan there is, but reading about the practice stuff with Copeland is like a page out of what I read and saw with Hurley’s St Ant’s group. With Copeland maybe the apple doesn’t fall far.

Some stuff in the article are things that have happened forever at D-I basketball players. Different times now. Harder for coaches to be old school with players, and the ones who can still get away with it are probably because they are legends and/or recruit a certain profile of kid they think can handle it.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,618
5,421
113
I had coaches like that. In fact, this is in the 60s, we were never allowed to drink any liquids during practice which almost always was at least 2 hours long. And some coaches had us taking salt pills during the practices.

Times have certainly changed.
 

SHUSource

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
41,832
3,921
48
I had coaches like that. In fact, this is in the 60s, we were never allowed to drink any liquids during practice which almost always was at least 2 hours long. And some coaches had us taking salt pills during the practices.

Times have certainly changed.
Thank God for that. I'm all for discipline, but this is dangerous cruelty with absolutely no upside. It has no place in the game.
 

NIL BAD

Junior
Aug 15, 2025
299
256
63
I had some of the toughest, demanding & nastiest coaches you could imagine in HS. Not one of them ever called any player a p*ssy or any of the other demeaning names mentioned in the article directly to their face. They might have said "You're playing like a p*ssy" but that is a different context in my opinion.

Like a previous poster said, needing water & other liquid hydration was definitely seen as a weakness & discouraged but that was a long time ago. To do so now is pure lunacy.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,618
5,421
113
Thank God for that. I'm all for discipline, but this is dangerous cruelty with absolutely no upside. It has no place in the game.
Remember this is in the late 60s. The coaches were doing what they thought was best back then. It wasn't punishment and we didn't take it as such. We thought it was helping us with endurance and the salt was giving us that endurance.

What Coupland is accused of doing is not the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PF58 and SHUSource

SHUSource

All-Conference
Jun 3, 2001
41,832
3,921
48
Remember this is in the late 60s. The coaches were doing what they thought was best back then. It wasn't punishment and we didn't take it as such. We thought it was helping us with endurance and the salt was giving us that endurance.

What Coupland is accused of doing is not the same.
I know it, but am still grateful they’ve gotten to be a little more enlightened in the time since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halldan

Bud Boomer

All-Conference
Dec 24, 2007
608
1,738
93
There are two sides to every story, but the Gatorade stuff seems too specific to be a lie. Yelling, bad language, name-calling, etc. doesn’t bother me, but forced dehydration is two or three steps removed from what is even remotely acceptable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Piratz and HALL85

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,051
1,030
113
The forced dehydration — which I know used to be a thing — just makes no sense these days for so many reasons. The language and name-calling I buy 100%, because we all know there are so many coaches who still act this way to players to varying degrees. Much harder to do it now though with credibility unless you are Tom Izzo or someone like that.
 

Piratz

All-Conference
Mar 24, 2004
1,314
2,578
113
There are two sides to every story, but the Gatorade stuff seems too specific to be a lie. Yelling, bad language, name-calling, etc. doesn’t bother me, but forced dehydration is two or three steps removed from what is even remotely acceptable.

The forced dehydration — which I know used to be a thing — just makes no sense these days for so many reasons. The language and name-calling I buy 100%, because we all know there are so many coaches who still act this way to players to varying degrees. Much harder to do it now though with credibility unless you are Tom Izzo or someone like that.
Completely agree. I played on enough teams when coaches were still mimicking Bobby Knight to know that the water break was a compliance weapon (🙄), but to the level of more dehydrations? Plural? Crazy.
 

dehere23

All-Conference
Feb 28, 2015
1,051
1,030
113
The “forced dehydration” allegations are just wild because (a) we have all the science now supporting the benefits of being hydrated, so why would you want your kids performing under less optimal conditions when there are other ways you can discipline and (b) it’s a potential major liability risk if you have players passing out because of dehydration (as alleged).

The language alleged, as uncouth as it may be, doesn’t surprise me and is definitely more common. Putting aside how coaches like our own beloved PJ were in that respect, how many times last year did we see Sha yelling “why the F would you do that to me”, or “what the F is wrong with you” on the court, visible for everyone to see on TV or hear at the game. And that’s bit behind the closed doors of practice.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,618
5,421
113
Sha was upset because he pulled all his regulars in the blowout and had multiple walk-ons on the court while Copeland not only kept his regulars in the game but pressed until the final buzzer.

A major breach of BB etiquette by Copeland and thus the harsh words between the two.
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
29,818
10,957
113
Sha was upset because he pulled all his regulars in the blowout and had multiple walk-ons on the court while Copeland not only kept his regulars in the game but pressed until the final buzzer.

A major breach of BB etiquette by Copeland and thus the harsh words between the two.
I remember that but given the disparity of the programs our subs should be able to compete with Wagner starters and wouldn’t that be valuable game experience for them? Etiquette or not, it was a dumb move by our coach.
 

lloyde dobler

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2004
729
1,100
82
I remember that but given the disparity of the programs our subs should be able to compete with Wagner starters and wouldn’t that be valuable game experience for them? Etiquette or not, it was a dumb move by our coach.
That’s not how the unwritten rules work
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,618
5,421
113
I remember that but given the disparity of the programs our subs should be able to compete with Wagner starters and wouldn’t that be valuable game experience for them? Etiquette or not, it was a dumb move by our coach.
Pete, It was players at the very end of the bench. Not just our non regulars. It included multiple walk-ons who hardly ever get on the court. Why would an opposing coach try to embarrass them while pressing them in the backcourt no less?

Plus, the team Copeland had in the game would get no benefit playing against those players.

Pure and simple it was a **** job by Copeland and Holloway had ever right to be pissed. No different than if Sha kept in his starters to embarrass Wagner trying to run up the score explaining...I wanted my team to keep their feet on the gas and learn to play with the lead. I wonder what Copeland would have said under those circumstances?

Terrible BB etiquette .
 

TheHall87

Senior
Jun 3, 2001
439
628
93
Sha was upset because he pulled all his regulars in the blowout and had multiple walk-ons on the court while Copeland not only kept his regulars in the game but pressed until the final buzzer.

A major breach of BB etiquette by Copeland and thus the harsh words between the two.
We had no walk-ons on the court according to the official box score. We played 10 players that day -- all "rotation" guys.

But yes, Brown and Ozdogan were on the floor the last five minutes.

I remember that but given the disparity of the programs our subs should be able to compete with Wagner starters and wouldn’t that be valuable game experience for them? Etiquette or not, it was a dumb move by our coach.
Both coaches overreacted. Their interaction should have been more civil.

That said down 25 after the last media timeout with the home team having called off the dogs, you don't need to go into overdrive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chickenbox

lloyde dobler

All-Conference
Jan 26, 2004
729
1,100
82
We had no walk-ons on the court according to the official box score. We played 10 players that day -- all "rotation" guys.

But yes, Brown and Ozdogan were on the floor the last five minutes.


Both coaches overreacted. Their interaction should have been more civil.

That said down 25 after the last media timeout with the home team having called off the dogs, you don't need to go into overdrive.
It’s a classic example of one of my favorite sports terms: False Hustle
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,618
5,421
113
We had no walk-ons on the court according to the official box score. We played 10 players that day -- all "rotation" guys.

But yes, Brown and Ozdogan were on the floor the last five minutes.
Good catch. The game I was referring to was one year sooner where we had multiple walk-ons on the court at game's end against Wagner.


Still my comments do not change.
 

HALL85

Heisman
Jul 5, 2001
29,818
10,957
113
We had no walk-ons on the court according to the official box score. We played 10 players that day -- all "rotation" guys.

But yes, Brown and Ozdogan were on the floor the last five minutes.


Both coaches overreacted. Their interaction should have been more civil.

That said down 25 after the last media timeout with the home team having called off the dogs, you don't need to go into overdrive.
That’s a fair position. Like you said, it was scholarship players, not walk ons. Over the top for Copeland to press, but Sha could’ve use it as a teaching experience for his bench or put starters back in.
 

Halldan

All-American
Staff member
Jan 1, 2003
183,618
5,421
113
Pete, doing that is not fair to the reserves who don't play much. Minutes are a precious reward for those players,

I was not a great admirer of Kevin Willard. But to his credit he did not run up scores and played his reserves whenever possible.

Unfortunately, now it's better to blow out teams which I find disgusting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrMtWood

chickenbox

Freshman
Jan 2, 2004
68
87
18
No different than if Sha kept in his starters to embarrass Wagner trying to run up the score explaining.
Quite different, actually. The equivalent would be Sha keeping in his starters against the end of rotation players of a power conference top team or otherwise blue blood (since they're at a level above SHU like SHU is at a level above Wagner).