I think people are/were too tough on Coleman. He was a sophomore thrust into a leading role on a historically terrible team. He had some excellent games and some terrible games like young players often do. He nursed injuries throughout, played a ton of minutes and got beat up as the focus of opposing defenses during Big East play.
He averaged 17.0 points, 5.9 rebounds & 1.4 steals in the Big East as a sophomore. His FG% sucked because he often took ill-advised shots like players on terrible offensive teams do. I never felt he was shooting selfishly. Sha wanted him shooting, who else was going to shoot? When you look at his BE play, you can break it down into 3 parts.
He started the BE with 5 excellent games where he averaged 23.2 points - 6.6 rebounds and shot 44 FG% - 43 3FG% - 83 FT%
Then things got rough. He became the target of everyone's defense, Chaunce was lost for the season. Coleman hurt his back missing 1 game and had 2 of his worst games when he returned. It all added up to a brutal 6 game stretch where he averaged 11.8 pts - 5.2 rebs and shot 26 FG% - 12 3FG% - 73 FT%
He was much better from then on, Dual was better at PG. In final 9 games Coleman averaged 17.9 points - 5.9 reb, shot 39 FG% - 24 3FG% - 67 FT%
I think as a Junior in his 3rd year with Sha and with a dynamic PG like Clark, he'd be a good player for us and much more efficient. I would have gone $1.2M for him as he's a bonafide BE starter and that is the going rate. I don't like losing our best player every year and I don't like that we still can't pay BE starter rates to anyone. If we wanted to move on from Coleman fine, but someone worthy should have been signed for $1-1.2 Million. That's what this team lacks, someone who can get you 20 points on any given night and be a threat on all 3 levels.