OT: New York Mets 2025-2026 Off Season Thread

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,758
12,800
66
Happy to number you as one of those who doesn't like Stearns for our President of Baseball Operations. Let's see how that works out in the long run.
Is there something factually wrong with my comment?

We can also add Montas / Siri / Mullens acquisitions etc.

We can also add him not improving the starting rotation at the deadline / not bringing up McLean sooner when the staff was drowning

Truth be told his performance to date is materially below expectations - and just like Mendoza - he needs to materially upgrade his game !
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUBob75

RUforJERSEY

All-American
Jul 29, 2001
24,624
9,770
113
Why? Are you going to stop following the Mets if Keith is not re-signed? Is anyone?

I personally think his act is getting a bit tired. With each passing year, his Archie Bell and the Drells references (to give one example) grow more and more meaningless.
I'm more tired of:

Say the Mets are playing the Cubs and the Cubs have 2nd and 3rd with one out in the 8th inning of a tie game. Dansby Swanson is at bat.

So Keith says now "Swanson shouldn't try to do too much here. Just a single or even a medium depth fly ball will get the job done and get that lead run in. "

Dude you're a Mets announcer. Sure I don't want Atlanta Braves type of homerism in the booth but IJS. Dude you're a Mets announcer.
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
37,565
19,275
98
Edgardo Alfonzo’s name being mentioned as potential coach.
 
Last edited:

willisneverrana43

All-American
Jul 26, 2001
10,806
6,800
113
Is there something factually wrong with my comment?

We can also add Montas / Siri / Mullens acquisitions etc.

We can also add him not improving the starting rotation at the deadline / not bringing up McLean sooner when the staff was drowning

Truth be told his performance to date is materially below expectations - and just like Mendoza - he needs to materially upgrade his game !
This analysis requires you to ignore that the Mets were anything but a perfect organization when he arrived, their performance last year in getting to the NLCS, and that he's only been here two years and you can't re-organize things for the long haul in just two years. That requires revamping from the minors on up. You'd also have to ignore his performance with the Brewers. If, of course, you're just a guy who complains when things go badly and doesn't complain (or maybe complains less) when they go well, then have at it.
 

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,758
12,800
66
This analysis requires you to ignore that the Mets were anything but a perfect organization when he arrived, their performance last year in getting to the NLCS, and that he's only been here two years and you can't re-organize things for the long haul in just two years. That requires revamping from the minors on up. You'd also have to ignore his performance with the Brewers. If, of course, you're just a guy who complains when things go badly and doesn't complain (or maybe complains less) when they go well, then have at it.
Please grade his performance in the 2 years he’s been here and for 2025 stand alone

He got a passing grade in 24 as his free agent signings panned out but he failed miserably in 25.

In fact I give him an “F” grade for his performance or lack of it in 25.

His wasting of $ on Montas. / Siri / lack of actual upgrades at the deadline / head scratchers with the rotation cost the team the playoffs.

Like I said - all the good will he established in 24 has been negated / tarnished and he needs to do a self analytical perspective of himself and his front office.

Excluding McLean - he has a rotation of all back end pitchers.

Thus he better upgrade the rotation and bring in 2 front line starters as the teams Immediate needs either via free agency and or trades.

He did take accountability for his F grade in his post Morten meeting with the media
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,785
52,480
102
Why? Are you going to stop following the Mets if Keith is not re-signed? Is anyone?

I personally think his act is getting a bit tired. With each passing year, his Archie Bell and the Drells references (to give one example) grow more and more meaningless.

I'm more tired of:

Say the Mets are playing the Cubs and the Cubs have 2nd and 3rd with one out in the 8th inning of a tie game. Dansby Swanson is at bat.

So Keith says now "Swanson shouldn't try to do too much here. Just a single or even a medium depth fly ball will get the job done and get that lead run in. "

Dude you're a Mets announcer. Sure I don't want Atlanta Braves type of homerism in the booth but IJS. Dude you're a Mets announcer.
To each his own.

He is still 1/3 of the best booth in baseball.
 

MadRU

Heisman
Jul 26, 2001
37,565
19,275
98
Don’t know how true, but, heard someone saying Pete wants 177 million for 6 years.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: T2Kplus20

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
30,037
21,929
113
Don’t know how true, but, heard someone saying Pete wants 177 million for 6 years.
I would actually be surprised if his initial asking price is that low. He and Boras will use Vladdy Jr's contract (14 years, $500M) as the comp. I think the sticker price is more like $230M/7.

That said, if the Mets hypothetically offered him $177M/6 to forgo free agency, I think he takes it. They won't though.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
121,899
37,629
113
I would actually be surprised if his initial asking price is that low. He and Boras will use Vladdy Jr's contract (14 years, $500M) as the comp. I think the sticker price is more like $230M/7.

That said, if the Mets hypothetically offered him $177M/6 to forgo free agency, I think he takes it. They won't though.
I would expect that to be in the ballpark. Not sure the Met's would go more than 4 years though.

As for Vlad comparison...it is such a difficult debate. Vlad is younger by 4 years. Prior to this year- he almost looked like his body would break down quickly but he does seem to have gotten himself into better shape.

Vlad is the better "hitter" but Pete is the better power hitter and run producer. Vlad will be a consistant .290-300 hitter with 20-30 HR and 90+ RBI and Pete will be .250-.270 30-40 HR and 100+ RBI

The youth give Vlad much more money, but Pete really isn't much behind him as a baseball hitter.

4/$125 M sounds about right. no opt outs on either side until year 3
 

willisneverrana43

All-American
Jul 26, 2001
10,806
6,800
113
Please grade his performance in the 2 years he’s been here and for 2025 stand alone . . .
No.

That's not how you build an organization, which requires a long term approach, not quick fixes. If you choose (as you have) not to be influenced by the incredible 8 years he spent building the Brewers system, one that paid dividends while he was there and continues to pay dividends even after he's left, then you're just going to have to wait to see how this works out over the next couple of years. Or you can continue, as you have, to judge year by year, month by month, and even game by game. It'll be a hell of a roller coaster ride.
 

rurahrah000

All-Conference
Aug 21, 2010
3,223
2,172
88
I would expect that to be in the ballpark. Not sure the Met's would go more than 4 years though.

As for Vlad comparison...it is such a difficult debate. Vlad is younger by 4 years. Prior to this year- he almost looked like his body would break down quickly but he does seem to have gotten himself into better shape.

Vlad is the better "hitter" but Pete is the better power hitter and run producer. Vlad will be a consistant .290-300 hitter with 20-30 HR and 90+ RBI and Pete will be .250-.270 30-40 HR and 100+ RBI

The youth give Vlad much more money, but Pete really isn't much behind him as a baseball hitter.

4/$125 M sounds about right. no opt outs on either side until year 3
4 years and $125 million or 5 years and $160 million makes the most sense. he would then be on same salary level and nearly as the same years remaining as Lindor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersNJ

RutgersNJ

Freshman
Jan 29, 2013
1,108
89
48
Mets suck.
That is all.
I take great pleasure in knowing THE METS had a huge hand in the Yankees failing to advance 2 steps less than last season ;) All I heard from you was how PLAN B worked out better and how great it was not having Soto.:ROFLMAO: Yes the Mets **** the bed, but still have the guy you needed desperately and who had a MVP type season and will be a cornerstone for the Mets for at least 10 more years. Once again "The Wait For 28" continues and don't tell me you've seen more than 6 or 7.
 

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,758
12,800
66
No.

That's not how you build an organization, which requires a long term approach, not quick fixes. If you choose (as you have) not to be influenced by the incredible 8 years he spent building the Brewers system, one that paid dividends while he was there and continues to pay dividends even after he's left, then you're just going to have to wait to see how this works out over the next couple of years. Or you can continue, as you have, to judge year by year, month by month, and even game by game. It'll be a hell of a roller coaster ride.
I’m arguing his performance sucked this year while you’re discussing long term approach

I don’t understand how you refuse to admit the above while hanging onto a long term approach that no one knows will be successful or not

The mission of this franchise should be to make the playoffs every year given it’s perceived talent and payroll!

The team failed miserably and embarrassingly this year with significant blame due to Stearns.

I don’t care what Stearns did at Milwaukee where there’s no pressure to win NOW. !

It’s different in NY and the Boy Wonder failed when the pressure was on !

I remain cautiously optimistic with Stearns but a lot of the shine has been tarnished for sure
 

RUBob75

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2003
905
1,085
93
I’m arguing his performance sucked this year while you’re discussing long term approach

I don’t understand how you refuse to admit the above while hanging onto a long term approach that no one knows will be successful or not

The mission of this franchise should be to make the playoffs every year given it’s perceived talent and payroll!

The team failed miserably and embarrassingly this year with significant blame due to Stearns.

I don’t care what Stearns did at Milwaukee where there’s no pressure to win NOW. !

It’s different in NY and the Boy Wonder failed when the pressure was on !

I remain cautiously optimistic with Stearns but a lot of the shine has been tarnished for sure
If I could like your post twice, I would!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigEastPhil

willisneverrana43

All-American
Jul 26, 2001
10,806
6,800
113
I’m arguing his performance sucked this year while you’re discussing long term approach

I don’t understand how you refuse to admit the above while hanging onto a long term approach that no one knows will be successful or not

. . .
You're unable to stop looking at the trees. The job of a president of baseball operations is, by definition, long term. The only way to guarantee yearly success is to build a system that produces constant talent, tons of it--and importantly, produces more talent than the other 29 experts who are trying to stock their systems. All 30 front offices are experts. You just need to be the best among that group. And once you build a system, you are less reliant on risky fix-it attempts in the middle of a season. Those short term, limited moves are inherently more risky and subject to failure more often. The Dodgers show up every year because they have built a system over the years. So do the Phillies and Yankees, for the most part. And so do, by the way, the Brewers. Even after Stearns left, that system is producing dividends. They don't need to make as many moves as the Mets have because they've built systems that produce more talent. They've been able to establish rosters and budgets that work over time. None of this is news or complicated.

As the Stearns continues to build the system, there will be less need for the risky types of trades that you are so short-sightedly focused on. If in a couple of years, the team is still reliant on those trades to be able to make the post season, then we can talk. But we wouldn't be talking about midseason trades. We'd be talking about Stearns being unable to create the type of system that he created in Milwaukee.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
113,785
52,480
102
You're unable to stop looking at the trees. The job of a president of baseball operations is, by definition, long term. The only way to guarantee yearly success is to build a system that produces constant talent, tons of it--and importantly, produces more talent than the other 29 experts who are trying to stock their systems. All 30 front offices are experts. You just need to be the best among that group. And once you build a system, you are less reliant on risky fix-it attempts in the middle of a season. Those short term, limited moves are inherently more risky and subject to failure more often. The Dodgers show up every year because they have built a system over the years. So do the Phillies and Yankees, for the most part. And so do, by the way, the Brewers. Even after Stearns left, that system is producing dividends. They don't need to make as many moves as the Mets have because they've built systems that produce more talent. They've been able to establish rosters and budgets that work over time. None of this is news or complicated.

As the Stearns continues to build the system, there will be less need for the risky types of trades that you are so short-sightedly focused on. If in a couple of years, the team is still reliant on those trades to be able to make the post season, then we can talk. But we wouldn't be talking about midseason trades. We'd be talking about Stearns being unable to create the type of system that he created in Milwaukee.
Two of those three never seem worry about money. Which hopefully is a Met “problem” now too.

As for the long term vs. short term approach, I like the former but the latter is the environment where this organization lives…the whole NY minute, back page, cross town rival, what have you done for me lately type thing.

Again, hopefully, this is where having an owner like Steve Cohen makes it easier to “correct” mistakes by buying the answers when needed.

So I think you and @BigEastPhil are both right.
 
Jul 4, 2025
727
447
63
Home grown
International signings
Alonso
McNeil
Nimmo
Alvarez
Baty
Mauricio
Vientos
Peterson
McLean
Sproat
Tong
 
Jul 4, 2025
727
447
63
F the Phillies
F them Hard !!!

Fans didn’t talk about excitement of possible World Series
Brewers being a team of nobodies and they can beat them
Dodgers weren’t the 110 win juggernaut they were expected to be
Cubs . Eh

NOPE

ONLY THING ON THIER MINDS WERE THE METS

Goodbye !!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersNJ

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
30,037
21,929
113
Postgame quote from Realmuto:

"Last year, I think it hurt even more, because last year it felt like we beat ourselves. This year, that club over there is very, very good."

At first, I thought he was taking a backhand slot at the Mets. Thinking about it further though, I realize he was taking a forehand shot at the Mets.
 
Jul 4, 2025
727
447
63
So 7-2 and 4-1 losses LY vs Mets were on them ??

Mets left 10 on base before Lindor’s grand slam

Again F-€k the Phillies and the eagles while you’re at it !!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RutgersNJ

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
30,037
21,929
113
Interesting that the Mets promoted from within to fill the hitting coach vacancy. Implies that the Mets are willing to ride with their current organizational hitting philosophy, whatever that is.

Re the Consiligere role, I prefer an experienced ex-manager like Gibbons, but whatever.