Is there something factually wrong with my comment?Happy to number you as one of those who doesn't like Stearns for our President of Baseball Operations. Let's see how that works out in the long run.
I'm more tired of:Why? Are you going to stop following the Mets if Keith is not re-signed? Is anyone?
I personally think his act is getting a bit tired. With each passing year, his Archie Bell and the Drells references (to give one example) grow more and more meaningless.
This analysis requires you to ignore that the Mets were anything but a perfect organization when he arrived, their performance last year in getting to the NLCS, and that he's only been here two years and you can't re-organize things for the long haul in just two years. That requires revamping from the minors on up. You'd also have to ignore his performance with the Brewers. If, of course, you're just a guy who complains when things go badly and doesn't complain (or maybe complains less) when they go well, then have at it.Is there something factually wrong with my comment?
We can also add Montas / Siri / Mullens acquisitions etc.
We can also add him not improving the starting rotation at the deadline / not bringing up McLean sooner when the staff was drowning
Truth be told his performance to date is materially below expectations - and just like Mendoza - he needs to materially upgrade his game !
Please grade his performance in the 2 years he’s been here and for 2025 stand aloneThis analysis requires you to ignore that the Mets were anything but a perfect organization when he arrived, their performance last year in getting to the NLCS, and that he's only been here two years and you can't re-organize things for the long haul in just two years. That requires revamping from the minors on up. You'd also have to ignore his performance with the Brewers. If, of course, you're just a guy who complains when things go badly and doesn't complain (or maybe complains less) when they go well, then have at it.
Why? Are you going to stop following the Mets if Keith is not re-signed? Is anyone?
I personally think his act is getting a bit tired. With each passing year, his Archie Bell and the Drells references (to give one example) grow more and more meaningless.
To each his own.I'm more tired of:
Say the Mets are playing the Cubs and the Cubs have 2nd and 3rd with one out in the 8th inning of a tie game. Dansby Swanson is at bat.
So Keith says now "Swanson shouldn't try to do too much here. Just a single or even a medium depth fly ball will get the job done and get that lead run in. "
Dude you're a Mets announcer. Sure I don't want Atlanta Braves type of homerism in the booth but IJS. Dude you're a Mets announcer.
I would actually be surprised if his initial asking price is that low. He and Boras will use Vladdy Jr's contract (14 years, $500M) as the comp. I think the sticker price is more like $230M/7.Don’t know how true, but, heard someone saying Pete wants 177 million for 6 years.
I would expect that to be in the ballpark. Not sure the Met's would go more than 4 years though.I would actually be surprised if his initial asking price is that low. He and Boras will use Vladdy Jr's contract (14 years, $500M) as the comp. I think the sticker price is more like $230M/7.
That said, if the Mets hypothetically offered him $177M/6 to forgo free agency, I think he takes it. They won't though.
No.Please grade his performance in the 2 years he’s been here and for 2025 stand alone . . .
4 years and $125 million or 5 years and $160 million makes the most sense. he would then be on same salary level and nearly as the same years remaining as Lindor.I would expect that to be in the ballpark. Not sure the Met's would go more than 4 years though.
As for Vlad comparison...it is such a difficult debate. Vlad is younger by 4 years. Prior to this year- he almost looked like his body would break down quickly but he does seem to have gotten himself into better shape.
Vlad is the better "hitter" but Pete is the better power hitter and run producer. Vlad will be a consistant .290-300 hitter with 20-30 HR and 90+ RBI and Pete will be .250-.270 30-40 HR and 100+ RBI
The youth give Vlad much more money, but Pete really isn't much behind him as a baseball hitter.
4/$125 M sounds about right. no opt outs on either side until year 3
I take great pleasure in knowing THE METS had a huge hand in the Yankees failing to advance 2 steps less than last seasonMets suck.
That is all.
I’m arguing his performance sucked this year while you’re discussing long term approachNo.
That's not how you build an organization, which requires a long term approach, not quick fixes. If you choose (as you have) not to be influenced by the incredible 8 years he spent building the Brewers system, one that paid dividends while he was there and continues to pay dividends even after he's left, then you're just going to have to wait to see how this works out over the next couple of years. Or you can continue, as you have, to judge year by year, month by month, and even game by game. It'll be a hell of a roller coaster ride.
If I could like your post twice, I would!!!I’m arguing his performance sucked this year while you’re discussing long term approach
I don’t understand how you refuse to admit the above while hanging onto a long term approach that no one knows will be successful or not
The mission of this franchise should be to make the playoffs every year given it’s perceived talent and payroll!
The team failed miserably and embarrassingly this year with significant blame due to Stearns.
I don’t care what Stearns did at Milwaukee where there’s no pressure to win NOW. !
It’s different in NY and the Boy Wonder failed when the pressure was on !
I remain cautiously optimistic with Stearns but a lot of the shine has been tarnished for sure
You're unable to stop looking at the trees. The job of a president of baseball operations is, by definition, long term. The only way to guarantee yearly success is to build a system that produces constant talent, tons of it--and importantly, produces more talent than the other 29 experts who are trying to stock their systems. All 30 front offices are experts. You just need to be the best among that group. And once you build a system, you are less reliant on risky fix-it attempts in the middle of a season. Those short term, limited moves are inherently more risky and subject to failure more often. The Dodgers show up every year because they have built a system over the years. So do the Phillies and Yankees, for the most part. And so do, by the way, the Brewers. Even after Stearns left, that system is producing dividends. They don't need to make as many moves as the Mets have because they've built systems that produce more talent. They've been able to establish rosters and budgets that work over time. None of this is news or complicated.I’m arguing his performance sucked this year while you’re discussing long term approach
I don’t understand how you refuse to admit the above while hanging onto a long term approach that no one knows will be successful or not
. . .
Two of those three never seem worry about money. Which hopefully is a Met “problem” now too.You're unable to stop looking at the trees. The job of a president of baseball operations is, by definition, long term. The only way to guarantee yearly success is to build a system that produces constant talent, tons of it--and importantly, produces more talent than the other 29 experts who are trying to stock their systems. All 30 front offices are experts. You just need to be the best among that group. And once you build a system, you are less reliant on risky fix-it attempts in the middle of a season. Those short term, limited moves are inherently more risky and subject to failure more often. The Dodgers show up every year because they have built a system over the years. So do the Phillies and Yankees, for the most part. And so do, by the way, the Brewers. Even after Stearns left, that system is producing dividends. They don't need to make as many moves as the Mets have because they've built systems that produce more talent. They've been able to establish rosters and budgets that work over time. None of this is news or complicated.
As the Stearns continues to build the system, there will be less need for the risky types of trades that you are so short-sightedly focused on. If in a couple of years, the team is still reliant on those trades to be able to make the post season, then we can talk. But we wouldn't be talking about midseason trades. We'd be talking about Stearns being unable to create the type of system that he created in Milwaukee.
Nice 24 hours with Yankees and Phillies both losing !
The Siri move was really bad Never wanted him.
Think he was a Yankees fan growing up. Great of him to make the majors as such a late round draft pick though.Shrewsbury. But went to RBR.