Stadium Vote:

[email protected]

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
614
710
93
I say start a fundraising campaign to rename Beaver Stadium to Paterno Stadium. If naming the field after Joe would have brought in $100 million as some claim, then shouldn't naming the stadium after him bring in an order of magnitude more?
Think $1 billion would be enough to get it done?

rolls off the tongue: west shore homes field at paterno stadium
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobPSU92

PSUFBFAN

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,212
3,031
113
I think the thing no one wants to talk about is, in general, there is no way to walk back the damage and connection between JVP and the whole horrible JS topic. In my opinon the only thing that can walk this back is if a good portion of the paid off accusers recanted their testimony and admit they really lied for the money. There is what is "right" and what is "realistic". If the BOT went ahead and named the field for our beloved HC can you imagine the shiitshow that would reemerge? We would be right back to where we were in 2011/12. Now, i do believe the BOT has no desire to honor JVP becasue they are strictly focused on $$, and that is what is driving them. To them, any attempt to honor JVP will bring down heat they are too weak to fight through. In the end, i just don't see any way to undo the damage that was done to an amazing man. Add to that the fact that the Paterno family felt their best option was to settle the lawsuit and take a deal. It sucks but JVP must live on in our hearts and minds... at least for the foreseeable future
Hammer meet nail.

Seeing the name "Joe Paterno Field" during live TV broadcasts ... the vitriol against Penn State would be off the charts. Anybody who doesn't think that the negative consequences for that (CFP rankings, TV appearances, recruiting) would cost Penn State down the road is blind to the realities of life.
 

psuro

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
8,411
18,270
113
I think the thing no one wants to talk about is, in general, there is no way to walk back the damage and connection between JVP and the whole horrible JS topic. In my opinon the only thing that can walk this back is if a good portion of the paid off accusers recanted their testimony and admit they really lied for the money. There is what is "right" and what is "realistic". If the BOT went ahead and named the field for our beloved HC can you imagine the shiitshow that would reemerge? We would be right back to where we were in 2011/12. Now, i do believe the BOT has no desire to honor JVP becasue they are strictly focused on $$, and that is what is driving them. To them, any attempt to honor JVP will bring down heat they are too weak to fight through. In the end, i just don't see any way to undo the damage that was done to an amazing man. Add to that the fact that the Paterno family felt their best option was to settle the lawsuit and take a deal. It sucks but JVP must live on in our hearts and minds... at least for the foreseeable future
Pretty much sums it up.

I would also like to point out, that despite the vitriol and angst, the Paterno name is still on the library.
 

Bwifan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,753
3,128
113
I ignored the gross portion of your original post where you allege Sandusky's innocence, and the guilt of the victims ... and I went to the portion where you said "Now, i do believe the BOT has no desire to honor JVP becasue they are strictly focused on $$, and that is what is driving them. To them, any attempt to honor JVP will bring down heat they are too weak to fight through." This necessarily implies that, if they were to honor JVP, the $$ would not be there. But, every time university funding issues come up on this board, the Joebots chime in to let us know that there would be money, if the BoT just made it right re the JoePa situation (exonerate and exalt), and they make sure we know they aren't contributing due to their displeasure with how the situation is being handled. But now you're suggesting the trustees don't want the heat, and they want the money, so they won't rattle any cages by doing the "right" thing (in your opinion, and those of other Joebots) ... ergo, the "heat" and the "money" are inversely related. So, my comments were entirely correct, based off your original commentary, and I'm not sure why you had issues with my reading of it. Lucky for me, I'm quite adept at "understand[ing] words grouped together into sentences."
A little better effort at trolling keep going
 

EricStratton-RushChairman

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2021
1,611
4,066
113
Hammer meet nail.

Seeing the name "Joe Paterno Field" during live TV broadcasts ... the vitriol against Penn State would be off the charts. Anybody who doesn't think that the negative consequences for that (CFP rankings, TV appearances, recruiting) would cost Penn State down the road is blind to the realities of life.
Your statement was more clear and used less words than mine :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: kgilbert78

Erial_Lion

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
2,558
3,104
113
Hammer meet nail.

Seeing the name "Joe Paterno Field" during live TV broadcasts ... the vitriol against Penn State would be off the charts. Anybody who doesn't think that the negative consequences for that (CFP rankings, TV appearances, recruiting) would cost Penn State down the road is blind to the realities of life.
It certainly wouldn't be impacting CFP rankings and TV appearances. And also very unlikely to have an impact on recruiting...then again, you never know what's going to swing a single recruit. There would be some blowback, but not nearly to the extent that you're thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grant Green

BobPSU92

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
18,605
27,948
113
Hammer meet nail.

Seeing the name "Joe Paterno Field" during live TV broadcasts ... the vitriol against Penn State would be off the charts. Anybody who doesn't think that the negative consequences for that (CFP rankings, TV appearances, recruiting) would cost Penn State down the road is blind to the realities of life.

This:

F*ck Off Field at Joe Paterno Stadium
 

Midnighter

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
10,258
16,308
113
“We have options that could bring in significantly more revenue that would have allowed us to show respect for our alums and our fans…to show respect for their concerns and their wishes and to build goodwill with all those folks,” trustee Barry Fenchak said.

“That goodwill you build up that leads to more revenue moving forward…and of course the opportunity to do the right thing by Joe and Sue Paterno.” Fenchak added that by approving Monday’s proposal, Penn State missed out on the opportunity to find better revenue streams, both from a Paterno Field proposal or other means.

When Fenchak raised his concerns to the full board, Vice President for Intercollegiate Athletics Pat Kraft said that the West Shore Home proposal was what the administration had to offer. “We chose one that provided less money, and all those other things got kicked to the curb,” Fenchak said. “I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the university.”

Penn State Trustees Argue Paterno Field Proposal More Valuable Than West Shore Home Field | Onward State

What is your source/evidence for 'bringing in significantly more revenue' than the West Shore deal? Sorry if provided in another thread.
 

PSUFBFAN

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
1,212
3,031
113
It certainly wouldn't be impacting CFP rankings and TV appearances. And also very unlikely to have an impact on recruiting...then again, you never know what's going to swing a single recruit. There would be some blowback, but not nearly to the extent that you're thinking.
Erial, I may have over-exaggerated somewhat, but the CFP committee is made up of humans that have biases and prejudices like all of us. Certainly, if Penn State were the only 13-0 team in the country, they are not going to get bounced out of the #1 seed.

But, if they are 9-3 and in the discussion with a couple of other 9-3 teams for the 8 seed (home game) or 9 seed (on the road), I'm willing to bet (see what I did there) that some of the folks on that committee would silently slot Penn State at #9 for no other reason than their prejudices against Joe Paterno and the fact that Penn State blatantly honored him by putting his name on the field.
 

Alphalion75

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2021
2,985
3,218
113
Hammer meet nail.

Seeing the name "Joe Paterno Field" during live TV broadcasts ... the vitriol against Penn State would be off the charts. Anybody who doesn't think that the negative consequences for that (CFP rankings, TV appearances, recruiting) would cost Penn State down the road is blind to the realities of life.
Ok...I agree, let's deal with realities. With that said, what is the reality in the context of donations? Would you agree that the most if not all of donations are made by alumni and people who have an interest in Penn State? So forget about those outsiders who still believe the false narratives that the media pushed during the JS affair. These people don't make donations to Penn State. So, amongst the former, do you believe the reality is that the majority of these people believe what happened to JVP was just? If it only comes down to money, it would be wise of the BOT and administration to determine which side of this issue the donors fall. As cold and caustic as that sounds....it is the reality in the context of money.
 

Bwifan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,753
3,128
113
Erial, I may have over-exaggerated somewhat, but the CFP committee is made up of humans that have biases and prejudices like all of us. Certainly, if Penn State were the only 13-0 team in the country, they are not going to get bounced out of the #1 seed.

But, if they are 9-3 and in the discussion with a couple of other 9-3 teams for the 8 seed (home game) or 9 seed (on the road), I'm willing to bet (see what I did there) that some of the folks on that committee would silently slot Penn State at #9 for no other reason than their prejudices against Joe Paterno and the fact that Penn State blatantly honored him by putting his name on the field.
Interesting point I also consider that soon that will be 15-20 years ago and how many people are around in those key decision making positions are there that remember that time frame and the pure vitriol that was everywhere. Thus let affect their decisions on whether PSU would get in or not.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
2,522
1,695
113
All of a sudden James is an icon. I'll save this for the first loss of the season. Talk about hypocrites.
Franklin isn't an icon. Or a speed bump. He's a football coach. What does his first loss of the season have to do with that? And what's hypocritical about calling a football coach a football coach? You may not understand these terms.
 

cjrugger

Well-known member
Sep 6, 2022
2,344
4,761
113
Tom Cruise GIF by Jerology
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
2,522
1,695
113
No one is responding to my question. How did Beaver Stadium get from it's 1966 version to today? I'd love for someone to tell me it had nothing to do with Joe.
Why would you love that?

Regardless, Joe had something to with Beaver Stadium getting from its (not "it's") 1966 version to today's version. Now what? Am I obligated to fund a statue, naming rights and the renaming of Saturday to Paternoday for all mankind? Or can we just acknowledge that JoePa impacted this program and then move on with our lives?
 

Marshall2323

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2024
1,125
1,826
113
Franklin isn't an icon. Or a speed bump. He's a football coach. What does his first loss of the season have to do with that? And what's hypocritical about calling a football coach a football coach? You may not understand these terms.

Franklin isn't an icon. Or a speed bump. He's a football coach. What does his first loss of the season have to do with that? And what's hypocritical about calling a football coach a football coach? You may not understand these terms.
Take a knee junior. You are out of your league.
 

Bwifan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,753
3,128
113
“We have options that could bring in significantly more revenue that would have allowed us to show respect for our alums and our fans…to show respect for their concerns and their wishes and to build goodwill with all those folks,” trustee Barry Fenchak said.

“That goodwill you build up that leads to more revenue moving forward…and of course the opportunity to do the right thing by Joe and Sue Paterno.” Fenchak added that by approving Monday’s proposal, Penn State missed out on the opportunity to find better revenue streams, both from a Paterno Field proposal or other means.

When Fenchak raised his concerns to the full board, Vice President for Intercollegiate Athletics Pat Kraft said that the West Shore Home proposal was what the administration had to offer. “We chose one that provided less money, and all those other things got kicked to the curb,” Fenchak said. “I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the university.”

Penn State Trustees Argue Paterno Field Proposal More Valuable Than West Shore Home Field | Onward State
Was talking to several friends who are alumni of PSU and they said when PSU calls for money and donations the callers have notes and ask I know in the past you have said you won't give another dime until PSU does something to honor Joe do you still feel the same or are you willing to donate any money now? They all said their responses were the same .... Nope and hang yup. I still believe PSU is missing getting a large chunk of money as Lubrano and others have said until they do something to honor Joe and Sue.
 
Last edited:

84lion

Well-known member
Oct 7, 2021
448
711
93
I would also like to point out, that despite the vitriol and angst, the Paterno name is still on the library.
But, anyone who cares about "college" football these days knows that players don't go to the library. And the networks certainly won't show it during their game coverage.
 

PSUFTG

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
1,520
2,475
113
What is your source/evidence for 'bringing in significantly more revenue' than the West Shore deal? Sorry if provided in another thread.
Detailed in my comments to the Board (the video link is posted somewhere on the board, anyone can access)) and my newsletter
 
  • Haha
Reactions: PSUJam

Corneliuswonder

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2021
6,516
15,205
113
“We have options that could bring in significantly more revenue that would have allowed us to show respect for our alums and our fans…to show respect for their concerns and their wishes and to build goodwill with all those folks,” trustee Barry Fenchak said.

“That goodwill you build up that leads to more revenue moving forward…and of course the opportunity to do the right thing by Joe and Sue Paterno.” Fenchak added that by approving Monday’s proposal, Penn State missed out on the opportunity to find better revenue streams, both from a Paterno Field proposal or other means.

When Fenchak raised his concerns to the full board, Vice President for Intercollegiate Athletics Pat Kraft said that the West Shore Home proposal was what the administration had to offer. “We chose one that provided less money, and all those other things got kicked to the curb,” Fenchak said. “I don’t think it’s in the best interests of the university.”

Penn State Trustees Argue Paterno Field Proposal More Valuable Than West Shore Home Field | Onward State
Are the “options that could bring in significantly more revenue” in the room with us right now?
 

ChandlerPearce58

Active member
Jun 24, 2024
247
298
63
You live in a world that is so black/white that the only possible options are "hate Joe" or "give $"?

Franklin isn't a speed bump. He's PSU football's head coach.

View attachment 770221

What value is there in having ethics? I can't answer that for you. I think you've answered that. There used to be a joke with the punchline...."we've already established what you are, we're just haggling over the price."
Again, people don't seem to read and comprehend. I don't necessarily have an issue with naming rights as much as I am saddened by the purposeful scrubbing of Joe from the history of the program. There are many ways his contributions could be recognized properly.
No one is responding to my question. How did Beaver Stadium get from it's 1966 version to today? I'd love for someone to tell me it had nothing to do with Joe.
Excellent post.....and an even better question. Reason no one answers your question is because of age....this difference of opinion seems to run along time. Those who attended PSU during 60s and 70s have a far different opinion than those attending during the 2000s. This is not to disparage the younger alumni...they didn' experience all that occurred during those growth years. Instead they experienced Erickson, Peetz, Frazier, Surma et all.
 

Alphalion75

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2021
2,985
3,218
113
What value is there in having ethics? I can't answer that for you. I think you've answered that. There used to be a joke with the punchline...."we've already established what you are, we're just haggling over the price."
Again, people don't seem to read and comprehend. I don't necessarily have an issue with naming rights as much as I am saddened by the purposeful scrubbing of Joe from the history of the program. There are many ways his contributions could be recognized properly.
No one is responding to my question. How did Beaver Stadium get from it's 1966 version to today? I'd love for someone to tell me it had nothing to do with Joe.
To be grammatical incorrect, Joe did not have "nothing" to do with, but had everything to do with it....period.
 

ChandlerPearce58

Active member
Jun 24, 2024
247
298
63
Hammer meet nail.

Seeing the name "Joe Paterno Field" during live TV broadcasts ... the vitriol against Penn State would be off the charts. Anybody who doesn't think that the negative consequences for that (CFP rankings, TV appearances, recruiting) would cost Penn State down the road is blind to the realities of life.
Luckily living in the South...there is very little vitriol as you predict....most people I meet traveling all say Joe got the shaft to protect others...daily I receive a "We Are".....
 

Marshall2323

Well-known member
Aug 7, 2024
1,125
1,826
113
Excellent post.....and an even better question. Reason no one answers your question is because of age....this difference of opinion seems to run along time. Those who attended PSU during 60s and 70s have a far different opinion than those attending during the 2000s. This is not to disparage the younger alumni...they didn' experience all that occurred during those growth years. Instead they experienced Erickson, Peetz, Frazier, Surma et all.
Then I would suggest that the "younger" generation of fans suffer from entitlement. As they have national championship appetites....but are guilty of failing to appreciate the foundations of success that the program was built upon.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
2,522
1,695
113
And, again, we're just subjected to nonsensical posts pumping up JoePa ... as if that matters and ends the discussion.

You can like and respect JoePa and still not think we need to rename buildings, fields, or anything else ... and still think we don't need to forego selling naming rights ... and still not just want to spend all our days living in the past.

The topic is selling naming rights ... and what's transpired is a bunch of people fawning over JoePa and trying to chastise people for not thinking about him like they do.

Damn, this is tedious. Focus.
 

Moogy

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2021
2,522
1,695
113
Here's the other tragic part of all this:

JoeBot: "JoePa was the greatest ... we owe him everything ... I so look up to the guy and respect what he did and what he stood for. That's why we need a statue. And the stadium/field named after him."

Person Not in a Cult: "JoePa wouldn't want a statue, or the stadium/field named after him. He made this clear. In fact, it was at the heart of what he stood for."

JoeBot: "Why would we listen to JoePa?!? We're here to respect him and show that we learned from him by not listening to what he taught or respecting his wishes!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThePennsyOracle

Bwifan

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2021
1,753
3,128
113
And, again, we're just subjected to nonsensical posts pumping up JoePa ... as if that matters and ends the discussion.

You can like and respect JoePa and still not think we need to rename buildings, fields, or anything else ... and still think we don't need to forego selling naming rights ... and still not just want to spend all our days living in the past.

The topic is selling naming rights ... and what's transpired is a bunch of people fawning over JoePa and trying to chastise people for not thinking about him like they do.

Damn, this is tedious. Focus.
You are always welcome to scroll on by and not respond or read that way it won't be so tedious for you.
 

ChandlerPearce58

Active member
Jun 24, 2024
247
298
63
And, again, we're just subjected to nonsensical posts pumping up JoePa ... as if that matters and ends the discussion.

You can like and respect JoePa and still not think we need to rename buildings, fields, or anything else ... and still think we don't need to forego selling naming rights ... and still not just want to spend all our days living in the past.

The topic is selling naming rights ... and what's transpired is a bunch of people fawning over JoePa and trying to chastise people for not thinking about him like they do.

Damn, this is tedious. Focus.
Your comments are so stale you have become comical. I agree that NO building or entity should need a name....so the Lincoln Memorial, the Walt Whitman Bridge, Fort Eisenhower, and nearly every naval ship should be stripped of their name. I have shown the tiny amount of money PSU is boasting about could have been accomplished while honoring Joe. The BOT refuses to even consider that. Remember this is a gift paid over 15 years, not a lump sum.
No one is chastising you or others for not knowing, understanding everything Joe did, achieved, and accomplished to bring PSU from a farming school in the 60's to a leader in academics, athletics, and research in the 21st century. Joe influenced much more than just the football team.
I understand nothing here will change your opinion.