I just want to say how stupid the ACC Men's Soccer Tournament format is.  All 15 teams are in the tourney.
But that just means the bottom feeders who have no business and no chance making the NCAA Tournament can potentially upset higher ranked teams harming their seed or knocking them out all-together.
"On the bubble"  for men's soccer is generally starts around RPI #30.  Above that and you should be a lock.  
Current ACC RPI rankings:
- UVA 6 
- Stanford 7
- NCSU 9
- Clemson 12
- UNC 17
- Notre Dame 29
- dook 30
- SMU 34
- WF 39
- VT 43
- ville 46
- Pitt 63
- Cuse 72
- BC 83
- Cal 97
So yes, we want teams like #9 WF and #10 VT to have a couple more shots to pick up some quality wins, so there is a good argument for more than 8 teams. 
But those bottom 12-15 teams have 1 ACC win each and have earned absolutely nothing. They have zero chance of building an NCAA resume in the ACCT; they can only win it all.  And by putting them in the tourney you run the risk of a team like UNC or Clemson getting harmed.  That is basically 7 play-in games and you only need to go to the ACC Network scheduling to see how much value those games have:  all of them are relegated to streaming only.
If they have kept the ACCT at 12 teams, it would still be a nice, even number,  and 4 teams would have earned a bye into the QF:  4 round of 16 games, 4 QF games works great for TV scheduling.
The argument against this is for those floundering teams to still have something to play for late in the regular season.  But we are now just 2 regular season games left and every single one of them is still alive for a 12th place finish which would be an ACCT berth.