“It’s more about fitting the offense around Sellers more so than it is how he would fit in this offense. We want him to be comfortable and we are going to do the things that he is comfortable with. Really excited about it. We’re gonna build the offense around LaNorris strengths.”
47 Replies
TrueGCFan
Dec 12, 4:12 PM
I hope Sellers trusts the process! I truly believe he will be a 1st rounder under Briles' offense scheme.
ChairForceCock
Dec 12, 4:16 PM
Those sound like words of him returning.
CLT Gamecock
Dec 12, 4:17 PM
This mean hes staying?
B.Springs Cock
Dec 12, 4:23 PM
That sounds incredibly simple but the fact is we haven't taken that approach in the last 5 seasons. It is so refreshing to hear.
803USC
Dec 12, 4:24 PM
B.Springs Cock said:We haven't had a play caller the last 5 plus years!! But we do now!!That sounds incredibly simple but the fact is we haven't taken that approach in the last 5 seasons. It is so refreshing to hear.
RickMiller
Dec 12, 4:29 PM
TrueGCFan said:This is literally the difference between a bad OC and a very good one. A very good one will tailor the offense around the talent which in essence makes it more of a multiple offense unless you carbon copy the QB and only recruit guys with a similar skill set. I also think this might be a factor as to convince Sellers to return.. Shula as much as it was a continuity hire he tried to get Sellers to be more of a pocket passer imo.“It’s more about fitting the offense around Sellers more so than it is how he would fit in this offense. We want him to be comfortable and we are going to do the things that he is comfortable with. Really excited about it. We’re gonna build the offense around LaNorris strengths.”
RoosterPrime
Dec 12, 4:31 PM
RickMiller said:Said he wouldn't do it and screwed the kid up before the Bowl game vs Illinois. One of the worst QB coaching jobs in history. You can't tank a kids draft stock worse than Shula did Sellers.This is literally the difference between a bad OC and a very good one. A very good one will tailor the offense around the talent which in essence makes it more of a multiple offense unless you carbon copy the QB and only recruit guys with a similar skill set. I also think this might be a factor as to convince Sellers to return.. Shula as much as it was a continuity hire he tried to get Sellers to be more of a pocket passer imo.
1Mcreekcock
Dec 12, 4:31 PM
I understand a coach making adjustments to current personnel but I hope it will be minor adjustments. Shane's decision to hire Briles should have been based on the success he has had with his offensive system, not to come in to train 1 particular QB. 🔥 away if you disagree.
FightinRooster
Dec 12, 4:32 PM
Music to my ears 😀
OGrooster
Dec 12, 4:34 PM
Really was great to hear him say that. I've wanted Kendall Briles for a while, and as much as I'm still pissed about this season, I'm excited for the next few years.
b.wun
Dec 12, 4:35 PM
1Mcreekcock said:You are correct that you want to have a basic system but any system should understand the talents that your people have and adjust to it. Otherwise you would keep running up the middle and lose a down and a yard.I understand a coach making adjustments to current personnel but I hope it will be minor adjustments. Shane's decision to hire Briles should have been based on the success he has had with his offensive system, not to come in to train 1 particular QB. 🔥 away if you disagree.
RickMiller
Dec 12, 4:36 PM
1Mcreekcock said:Briles is not here to train Sellers or even to convince Sellers to return. Briles only comment about Sellers was he would tailor his offense around Sellers meaning his play calling will better suit Sellers skill set and not try to change Sellers in any way like Shula did trying to keep sellers in the pocket more.I understand a coach making adjustments to current personnel but I hope it will be minor adjustments. Shane's decision to hire Briles should have been based on the success he has had with his offensive system, not to come in to train 1 particular QB. 🔥 away if you disagree.
FightinRooster
Dec 12, 4:36 PM
1Mcreekcock said:Just my thoughts. He has his offense he runs but he will tweak according to personnel. He said he wants Sellers to be comfortable. He won’t design a completely new offense just for Sellers.I understand a coach making adjustments to current personnel but I hope it will be minor adjustments. Shane's decision to hire Briles should have been based on the success he has had with his offensive system, not to come in to train 1 particular QB. 🔥 away if you disagree.
GLiDE
Dec 12, 4:37 PM
The BEST Offensive Coordinators scheme and play call around the talent that they have on the field instead of putting a square peg in a round hole!!!
GLiDE
Dec 12, 4:38 PM
RickMiller said:He also added at the end "and all of our personnel"!!!Briles is not here to train Sellers or even to convince Sellers to return. Briles only comment about Sellers was he would tailor his offense around Sellers meaning his play calling will better suit Sellers skill set and not try to change Sellers in any way like Shula did trying to keep sellers in the pocket more.
RickMiller
Dec 12, 4:43 PM
GLiDE said:That part especially excited me. Meaning the playbook could change based on who is playing QB. Of course there will be plays that any QB is going to run but from the sounds of it for example Briles will not call a play that is meant for a dual threat when he has more of a pocket passer playing.. Sign me up!!!He also added at the end "and all of our personnel"!!!
Arget
Dec 12, 4:43 PM
1Mcreekcock said:I understand a coach making adjustments to current personnel but I hope it will be minor adjustments. Shane's decision to hire Briles should have been based on the success he has had with his offensive system, not to come in to train 1 particular QB. 🔥 away if you disagree.
RickMiller
Dec 12, 4:55 PM
Go Cocks!!!!RoosterPrime
Dec 12, 4:57 PM
1Mcreekcock said:I don't think Briles will do that. Because honestly what Sellers does best is HUNH from the spread.I understand a coach making adjustments to current personnel but I hope it will be minor adjustments. Shane's decision to hire Briles should have been based on the success he has had with his offensive system, not to come in to train 1 particular QB. 🔥 away if you disagree.
80and90gcock
Dec 12, 4:58 PM
RickMiller said:POTD!!Go Cocks!!!!
MyrtleBeachDave
Dec 12, 5:00 PM
B.Springs Cock said:I believe Loggains pretty much did that. We and 16 were pretty good that year!That sounds incredibly simple but the fact is we haven't taken that approach in the last 5 seasons. It is so refreshing to hear.
PD-Cock
Dec 12, 5:24 PM
Has Sellers himself made comments that's led so many to question/suggest he's not returning?
1Mcreekcock
Dec 12, 5:24 PM
RickMiller said:I would be thrilled for LaNorris to pass for 3,000 yards and rush for another 800 next year but I also want to be realistic. For most of his 2 seasons as a starter LS16 has played in systems that didn't fit his skill set. During the 6 game win streak most of the big plays came on improvised scramble runs or late scramble passes, so what SYSTEM is gonna be best for him. LS16 seems to be most comfortable with rolling out, throwing on the move. I admit, I have not seen much of Briles offense as oc at TCU but a lot of his schemes seem to be based on timing. Hopefully Briles will be able to coach up LaNorris so that he is comfortable within his system. This will require LS16 to totally buy into the system and lots of repetitions to feel comfortable making these quick decisions. Hopefully this will be a smooth transition.Briles is not here to train Sellers or even to convince Sellers to return. Briles only comment about Sellers was he would tailor his offense around Sellers meaning his play calling will better suit Sellers skill set and not try to change Sellers in any way like Shula did trying to keep sellers in the pocket more.
B.Springs Cock
Dec 12, 5:25 PM
MyrtleBeachDave said:Loggains was pretty good when he got his feet back up under him. But I wish the hire had been Briles instead of Loggains. That was an opportunity to reset our offense.I believe Loggains pretty much did that. We and 16 were pretty good that year!
Thanks for checking out this free message board preview.
Join the full discussion at The Insiders Forum